Report on a Community in Chaos:
(continued from page 1)
Reliability and stability take a back seat to open systems
Asked about his return to the e3000 after three years working with other technologies, Lancaster said, “It’s not that it’s an old technology,
as much as it is a proprietary technology. MPE is an amazing piece of work, and its reliability has been both its biggest draw and
its biggest drawback.”
Lancaster listened to HP say that without their guiding hands after 2006, e3000 users would be in big trouble. “Seeing this really got me
riled. There’s such a strong community of support available for the 3000 that I knew we could do something to counteract HP’s message
of doom.” But, a contented community is a quiet community. Lancaster described the bond he’d always felt with others in the e3000
community. It was for years HP’s only commercial general-purpose business computer.
The rapid growth of HP-UX, Linux, and now Intel servers forced the e3000 into the shadows both inside and outside HP. “I think I saw
it coming in the late 90’s,” says Lancaster. He spent three years negotiating with the old guard of the e3000 community to put together
the very successful HP e3000 Solutions Symposium in early 2001. “As difficult as it was to persuade people that the symposium was a
good idea, HP’s announcement just months later shouldn’t have been a surprise.”
Coming back home… or “Homesteading”?
Many e3000 customers felt betrayed and let down by HP, especially on the heels of making a five-year commitment to the e3000. It was
during this initial time of confusion that the term “Homesteading” was used to describe those who choose to remain on the e3000. The
term “homesteading” today often refers to those who prefer to do for themselves what had been commonly provided by the government
or other large organizations. It is a term that depicts independence and self-sufficiency. (Story continued on page 4)
(Story continued on page 4)